Croatia vs Oman: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square

Croatia
0 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Oman
0 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Croatia rank
93rd
Oman rank
93rd

Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square over time

  • Croatia
  • Oman
050100150200197019952021

How they compare

Croatia currently reports 0 current US$ per square kilometre against 0 current US$ per square kilometre in Oman, a difference of 0 current US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 30 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Oman ahead.

Croatia ranks 93rd and Oman ranks 93rd of 216 countries.

Oman has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Croatia Oman Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0857 current US$ per square kilometre 6.09 current US$ per square kilometre 6 current US$ per square kilometre Oman
2000s 0.0005 current US$ per square kilometre 2.31 current US$ per square kilometre 2.31 current US$ per square kilometre Oman
2010s 0.1162 current US$ per square kilometre 53.68 current US$ per square kilometre 53.56 current US$ per square kilometre Oman
2020s 0 current US$ per square kilometre 0 current US$ per square kilometre 0 current US$ per square kilometre —

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square, Croatia or Oman?
Croatia, at 0 current US$ per square kilometre against 0 current US$ per square kilometre in Oman as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square between Croatia and Oman?
0 current US$ per square kilometre, with Croatia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and Oman?
30 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2021.
How do Croatia and Oman rank globally for adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square?
Croatia ranks 93rd and Oman ranks 93rd of 216 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Croatia vs Oman: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-mineral-depletion-current-us-per-square-kilometre/croatia/oman/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-mineral-depletion-current-us-per-square-kilometre/croatia/oman/">Croatia vs Oman: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
217 places, 10,348 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.