Congo vs Suriname: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square
Congo
0 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Suriname
0 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Congo rank
93rd
Suriname rank
93rd
Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square over time
- Congo
- Suriname
How they compare
Congo currently reports 0 current US$ per square kilometre against 0 current US$ per square kilometre in Suriname, a difference of 0 current US$ per square kilometre.
Across all 52 years both countries report, Suriname has been ahead every year.
Congo ranks 93rd and Suriname ranks 93rd of 216 countries.
Suriname has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Suriname | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 3.6 current US$ per square kilometre | 76.4 current US$ per square kilometre | 72.8 current US$ per square kilometre | Suriname |
| 1980s | 3.56 current US$ per square kilometre | 77.6 current US$ per square kilometre | 74.04 current US$ per square kilometre | Suriname |
| 1990s | 5.96 current US$ per square kilometre | 48.22 current US$ per square kilometre | 42.26 current US$ per square kilometre | Suriname |
| 2000s | 0.7105 current US$ per square kilometre | 267.14 current US$ per square kilometre | 266.43 current US$ per square kilometre | Suriname |
| 2010s | 3.43 current US$ per square kilometre | 2,084 current US$ per square kilometre | 2,081 current US$ per square kilometre | Suriname |
| 2020s | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square, Congo or Suriname?
- Congo, at 0 current US$ per square kilometre against 0 current US$ per square kilometre in Suriname as of 2021.
- What is the difference in adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square between Congo and Suriname?
- 0 current US$ per square kilometre, with Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Suriname?
- 52 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2021.
- How do Congo and Suriname rank globally for adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square?
- Congo ranks 93rd and Suriname ranks 93rd of 216 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.