Congo vs North Macedonia: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square

Congo
0 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
North Macedonia
0 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Congo rank
93rd
North Macedonia rank
93rd

Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square over time

  • Congo
  • North Macedonia
02.0k4.0k6.0k8.0k197019952021

How they compare

Congo currently reports 0 current US$ per square kilometre against 0 current US$ per square kilometre in North Macedonia, a difference of 0 current US$ per square kilometre.

Across all 30 years both countries report, North Macedonia has been ahead every year.

Congo ranks 93rd and North Macedonia ranks 93rd of 216 countries.

North Macedonia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo North Macedonia Difference Ahead
1990s 4.93 current US$ per square kilometre 210.35 current US$ per square kilometre 205.42 current US$ per square kilometre North Macedonia
2000s 0.7105 current US$ per square kilometre 1,420 current US$ per square kilometre 1,420 current US$ per square kilometre North Macedonia
2010s 3.43 current US$ per square kilometre 2,023 current US$ per square kilometre 2,020 current US$ per square kilometre North Macedonia
2020s 0 current US$ per square kilometre 0 current US$ per square kilometre 0 current US$ per square kilometre —

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square, Congo or North Macedonia?
Congo, at 0 current US$ per square kilometre against 0 current US$ per square kilometre in North Macedonia as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square between Congo and North Macedonia?
0 current US$ per square kilometre, with Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and North Macedonia?
30 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2021.
How do Congo and North Macedonia rank globally for adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square?
Congo ranks 93rd and North Macedonia ranks 93rd of 216 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo vs North Macedonia: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-mineral-depletion-current-us-per-square-kilometre/congo-rep/north-macedonia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-mineral-depletion-current-us-per-square-kilometre/congo-rep/north-macedonia/">Congo vs North Macedonia: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
217 places, 10,348 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.