Congo vs Italy: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square
Congo
0 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Italy
0 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Congo rank
93rd
Italy rank
93rd
Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square over time
- Congo
- Italy
How they compare
Congo currently reports 0 current US$ per square kilometre against 0 current US$ per square kilometre in Italy, a difference of 0 current US$ per square kilometre.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 52 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Italy ahead.
Congo ranks 93rd and Italy ranks 93rd of 216 countries.
Italy has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Italy | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 3.6 current US$ per square kilometre | 29.49 current US$ per square kilometre | 25.89 current US$ per square kilometre | Italy |
| 1980s | 3.56 current US$ per square kilometre | 36.06 current US$ per square kilometre | 32.5 current US$ per square kilometre | Italy |
| 1990s | 5.96 current US$ per square kilometre | 11.45 current US$ per square kilometre | 5.49 current US$ per square kilometre | Italy |
| 2000s | 0.7105 current US$ per square kilometre | 6.35 current US$ per square kilometre | 5.64 current US$ per square kilometre | Italy |
| 2010s | 3.43 current US$ per square kilometre | 6.21 current US$ per square kilometre | 2.79 current US$ per square kilometre | Italy |
| 2020s | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square, Congo or Italy?
- Congo, at 0 current US$ per square kilometre against 0 current US$ per square kilometre in Italy as of 2021.
- What is the difference in adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square between Congo and Italy?
- 0 current US$ per square kilometre, with Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Italy?
- 52 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2021.
- How do Congo and Italy rank globally for adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square?
- Congo ranks 93rd and Italy ranks 93rd of 216 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.