Congo vs El Salvador: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square

Congo
0 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
El Salvador
0 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Congo rank
93rd
El Salvador rank
93rd

Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square over time

  • Congo
  • El Salvador
020406080197019952021

How they compare

Congo currently reports 0 current US$ per square kilometre against 0 current US$ per square kilometre in El Salvador, a difference of 0 current US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 52 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Congo ahead.

Congo ranks 93rd and El Salvador ranks 93rd of 216 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 4 and El Salvador in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo El Salvador Difference Ahead
1970s 3.6 current US$ per square kilometre 3.25 current US$ per square kilometre 0.3511 current US$ per square kilometre Congo
1980s 3.56 current US$ per square kilometre 11.64 current US$ per square kilometre 8.08 current US$ per square kilometre El Salvador
1990s 5.96 current US$ per square kilometre 1.86 current US$ per square kilometre 4.1 current US$ per square kilometre Congo
2000s 0.7105 current US$ per square kilometre 0 current US$ per square kilometre 0.7105 current US$ per square kilometre Congo
2010s 3.43 current US$ per square kilometre 0 current US$ per square kilometre 3.43 current US$ per square kilometre Congo
2020s 0 current US$ per square kilometre 0 current US$ per square kilometre 0 current US$ per square kilometre —

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square, Congo or El Salvador?
Congo, at 0 current US$ per square kilometre against 0 current US$ per square kilometre in El Salvador as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square between Congo and El Salvador?
0 current US$ per square kilometre, with Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and El Salvador?
52 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2021.
How do Congo and El Salvador rank globally for adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square?
Congo ranks 93rd and El Salvador ranks 93rd of 216 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo vs El Salvador: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-mineral-depletion-current-us-per-square-kilometre/congo-rep/el-salvador/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-mineral-depletion-current-us-per-square-kilometre/congo-rep/el-salvador/">Congo vs El Salvador: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
217 places, 10,348 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.