Democratic Republic of Congo vs Zambia: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square

Democratic Republic of Congo
5,196 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Zambia
5,719 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Democratic Republic of Congo rank
21st
Zambia rank
19th

Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square over time

  • Democratic Republic of Congo
  • Zambia
02.0k4.0k6.0k197019952021

How they compare

Zambia currently reports 5,719 current US$ per square kilometre against 5,196 current US$ per square kilometre in Democratic Republic of Congo, a difference of 523 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Zambia's figure about 1.1 times Democratic Republic of Congo's.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 52 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Zambia ahead.

Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 21st and Zambia ranks 19th of 216 countries.

Zambia has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Democratic Republic of Congo Zambia Difference Ahead
1970s 27.65 current US$ per square kilometre 340.2 current US$ per square kilometre 312.55 current US$ per square kilometre Zambia
1980s 29.97 current US$ per square kilometre 182.88 current US$ per square kilometre 152.91 current US$ per square kilometre Zambia
1990s 5.68 current US$ per square kilometre 38.95 current US$ per square kilometre 33.27 current US$ per square kilometre Zambia
2000s 43.62 current US$ per square kilometre 573.26 current US$ per square kilometre 529.64 current US$ per square kilometre Zambia
2010s 543.65 current US$ per square kilometre 1,287 current US$ per square kilometre 743.31 current US$ per square kilometre Zambia
2020s 3,084 current US$ per square kilometre 3,521 current US$ per square kilometre 436.65 current US$ per square kilometre Zambia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square, Democratic Republic of Congo or Zambia?
Zambia, at 5,719 current US$ per square kilometre against 5,196 current US$ per square kilometre in Democratic Republic of Congo as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square between Democratic Republic of Congo and Zambia?
523 current US$ per square kilometre, with Zambia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Democratic Republic of Congo and Zambia?
52 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2021.
How do Democratic Republic of Congo and Zambia rank globally for adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square?
Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 21st and Zambia ranks 19th of 216 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Democratic Republic of Congo vs Zambia: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-mineral-depletion-current-us-per-square-kilometre/congo-dem-rep/zambia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-mineral-depletion-current-us-per-square-kilometre/congo-dem-rep/zambia/">Democratic Republic of Congo vs Zambia: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
217 places, 10,348 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.