Democratic Republic of Congo vs Kazakhstan: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square

Democratic Republic of Congo
5,196 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Kazakhstan
4,167 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Democratic Republic of Congo rank
21st
Kazakhstan rank
24th

Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square over time

  • Democratic Republic of Congo
  • Kazakhstan
02.0k4.0k6.0k197019952021

How they compare

Democratic Republic of Congo currently reports 5,196 current US$ per square kilometre against 4,167 current US$ per square kilometre in Kazakhstan, a difference of 1,029 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Democratic Republic of Congo's figure about 1.2 times Kazakhstan's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 30 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Kazakhstan ahead.

Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 21st and Kazakhstan ranks 24th of 216 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Democratic Republic of Congo averaged higher in 1 and Kazakhstan in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Democratic Republic of Congo Kazakhstan Difference Ahead
1990s 1.3 current US$ per square kilometre 13.81 current US$ per square kilometre 12.5 current US$ per square kilometre Kazakhstan
2000s 43.62 current US$ per square kilometre 310.36 current US$ per square kilometre 266.75 current US$ per square kilometre Kazakhstan
2010s 543.65 current US$ per square kilometre 1,147 current US$ per square kilometre 603.12 current US$ per square kilometre Kazakhstan
2020s 3,084 current US$ per square kilometre 2,937 current US$ per square kilometre 147.51 current US$ per square kilometre Democratic Republic of Congo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square, Democratic Republic of Congo or Kazakhstan?
Democratic Republic of Congo, at 5,196 current US$ per square kilometre against 4,167 current US$ per square kilometre in Kazakhstan as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square between Democratic Republic of Congo and Kazakhstan?
1,029 current US$ per square kilometre, with Democratic Republic of Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Democratic Republic of Congo and Kazakhstan?
30 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2021.
How do Democratic Republic of Congo and Kazakhstan rank globally for adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square?
Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 21st and Kazakhstan ranks 24th of 216 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Democratic Republic of Congo vs Kazakhstan: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-mineral-depletion-current-us-per-square-kilometre/congo-dem-rep/kazakhstan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-mineral-depletion-current-us-per-square-kilometre/congo-dem-rep/kazakhstan/">Democratic Republic of Congo vs Kazakhstan: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
217 places, 10,348 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.