Democratic Republic of Congo vs Guatemala: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square

Democratic Republic of Congo
5,196 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Guatemala
4,215 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Democratic Republic of Congo rank
21st
Guatemala rank
23rd

Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square over time

  • Democratic Republic of Congo
  • Guatemala
02.0k4.0k6.0k197019952021

How they compare

Democratic Republic of Congo currently reports 5,196 current US$ per square kilometre against 4,215 current US$ per square kilometre in Guatemala, a difference of 981 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Democratic Republic of Congo's figure about 1.2 times Guatemala's.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 52 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Democratic Republic of Congo ahead.

Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 21st and Guatemala ranks 23rd of 216 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Democratic Republic of Congo averaged higher in 4 and Guatemala in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Democratic Republic of Congo Guatemala Difference Ahead
1970s 27.65 current US$ per square kilometre 20.44 current US$ per square kilometre 7.21 current US$ per square kilometre Democratic Republic of Congo
1980s 29.97 current US$ per square kilometre 13.47 current US$ per square kilometre 16.5 current US$ per square kilometre Democratic Republic of Congo
1990s 5.68 current US$ per square kilometre 4.81 current US$ per square kilometre 0.8724 current US$ per square kilometre Democratic Republic of Congo
2000s 43.62 current US$ per square kilometre 374.43 current US$ per square kilometre 330.81 current US$ per square kilometre Guatemala
2010s 543.65 current US$ per square kilometre 2,030 current US$ per square kilometre 1,487 current US$ per square kilometre Guatemala
2020s 3,084 current US$ per square kilometre 2,817 current US$ per square kilometre 267.79 current US$ per square kilometre Democratic Republic of Congo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square, Democratic Republic of Congo or Guatemala?
Democratic Republic of Congo, at 5,196 current US$ per square kilometre against 4,215 current US$ per square kilometre in Guatemala as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square between Democratic Republic of Congo and Guatemala?
981 current US$ per square kilometre, with Democratic Republic of Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Democratic Republic of Congo and Guatemala?
52 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2021.
How do Democratic Republic of Congo and Guatemala rank globally for adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square?
Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 21st and Guatemala ranks 23rd of 216 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Democratic Republic of Congo vs Guatemala: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-mineral-depletion-current-us-per-square-kilometre/congo-dem-rep/guatemala/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-mineral-depletion-current-us-per-square-kilometre/congo-dem-rep/guatemala/">Democratic Republic of Congo vs Guatemala: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
217 places, 10,348 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.