China vs Zambia: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square

China
6,030 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Zambia
5,719 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
China rank
16th
Zambia rank
19th

Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square over time

  • China
  • Zambia
05.0k10.0k15.0k197019952021

How they compare

China currently reports 6,030 current US$ per square kilometre against 5,719 current US$ per square kilometre in Zambia, a difference of 311 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes China's figure about 1.1 times Zambia's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 52 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Zambia ahead.

China ranks 16th and Zambia ranks 19th of 216 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, China averaged higher in 4 and Zambia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade China Zambia Difference Ahead
1970s 20.93 current US$ per square kilometre 340.2 current US$ per square kilometre 319.26 current US$ per square kilometre Zambia
1980s 75.66 current US$ per square kilometre 182.88 current US$ per square kilometre 107.22 current US$ per square kilometre Zambia
1990s 123.38 current US$ per square kilometre 38.95 current US$ per square kilometre 84.43 current US$ per square kilometre China
2000s 1,967 current US$ per square kilometre 573.26 current US$ per square kilometre 1,394 current US$ per square kilometre China
2010s 4,352 current US$ per square kilometre 1,287 current US$ per square kilometre 3,065 current US$ per square kilometre China
2020s 3,893 current US$ per square kilometre 3,521 current US$ per square kilometre 372.37 current US$ per square kilometre China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square, China or Zambia?
China, at 6,030 current US$ per square kilometre against 5,719 current US$ per square kilometre in Zambia as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square between China and Zambia?
311 current US$ per square kilometre, with China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China and Zambia?
52 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2021.
How do China and Zambia rank globally for adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square?
China ranks 16th and Zambia ranks 19th of 216 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China vs Zambia: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-mineral-depletion-current-us-per-square-kilometre/china/zambia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-mineral-depletion-current-us-per-square-kilometre/china/zambia/">China vs Zambia: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
217 places, 10,348 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.