Chad vs Denmark: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square

Chad
0 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Denmark
0 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Chad rank
93rd
Denmark rank
93rd

Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square over time

  • Chad
  • Denmark
0100200300400197019952021

How they compare

Chad currently reports 0 current US$ per square kilometre against 0 current US$ per square kilometre in Denmark, a difference of 0 current US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 52 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Denmark ahead.

Chad ranks 93rd and Denmark ranks 93rd of 216 countries.

Denmark has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chad Denmark Difference Ahead
1970s 0 current US$ per square kilometre 1.48 current US$ per square kilometre 1.48 current US$ per square kilometre Denmark
1980s 0 current US$ per square kilometre 46.95 current US$ per square kilometre 46.95 current US$ per square kilometre Denmark
1990s 0 current US$ per square kilometre 16.37 current US$ per square kilometre 16.37 current US$ per square kilometre Denmark
2000s 0.2128 current US$ per square kilometre 123.12 current US$ per square kilometre 122.91 current US$ per square kilometre Denmark
2010s 0.2325 current US$ per square kilometre 27.47 current US$ per square kilometre 27.23 current US$ per square kilometre Denmark
2020s 0 current US$ per square kilometre 0 current US$ per square kilometre 0 current US$ per square kilometre —

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square, Chad or Denmark?
Chad, at 0 current US$ per square kilometre against 0 current US$ per square kilometre in Denmark as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square between Chad and Denmark?
0 current US$ per square kilometre, with Chad ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chad and Denmark?
52 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2021.
How do Chad and Denmark rank globally for adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square?
Chad ranks 93rd and Denmark ranks 93rd of 216 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chad vs Denmark: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-mineral-depletion-current-us-per-square-kilometre/chad/denmark/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-mineral-depletion-current-us-per-square-kilometre/chad/denmark/">Chad vs Denmark: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
217 places, 10,348 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.