Central African Republic vs South Sudan: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square

Central African Republic
24.05 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
South Sudan
11.45 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Central African Republic rank
84th
South Sudan rank
87th

Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square over time

  • Central African Republic
  • South Sudan
0510152025197019952021

How they compare

Central African Republic currently reports 24.05 current US$ per square kilometre against 11.45 current US$ per square kilometre in South Sudan, a difference of 12.6 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Central African Republic's figure about 2.1 times South Sudan's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Central African Republic ahead.

Central African Republic ranks 84th and South Sudan ranks 87th of 216 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Central African Republic averaged higher in 1 and South Sudan in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Central African Republic South Sudan Difference Ahead
2010s 1.15 current US$ per square kilometre 2.1 current US$ per square kilometre 0.9529 current US$ per square kilometre South Sudan
2020s 14.61 current US$ per square kilometre 7.14 current US$ per square kilometre 7.47 current US$ per square kilometre Central African Republic

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square, Central African Republic or South Sudan?
Central African Republic, at 24.05 current US$ per square kilometre against 11.45 current US$ per square kilometre in South Sudan as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square between Central African Republic and South Sudan?
12.6 current US$ per square kilometre, with Central African Republic ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and South Sudan?
10 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2021.
How do Central African Republic and South Sudan rank globally for adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square?
Central African Republic ranks 84th and South Sudan ranks 87th of 216 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Central African Republic vs South Sudan: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-mineral-depletion-current-us-per-square-kilometre/central-african-republic/south-sudan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-mineral-depletion-current-us-per-square-kilometre/central-african-republic/south-sudan/">Central African Republic vs South Sudan: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
217 places, 10,348 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.