Cameroon vs Equatorial Guinea: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square
Cameroon
0 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Equatorial Guinea
0 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Cameroon rank
93rd
Equatorial Guinea rank
93rd
Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square over time
- Cameroon
- Equatorial Guinea
How they compare
Cameroon currently reports 0 current US$ per square kilometre against 0 current US$ per square kilometre in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 0 current US$ per square kilometre.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 52 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Equatorial Guinea ahead.
Cameroon ranks 93rd and Equatorial Guinea ranks 93rd of 216 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Cameroon averaged higher in 2 and Equatorial Guinea in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cameroon | Equatorial Guinea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 0.0006 current US$ per square kilometre | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.0006 current US$ per square kilometre | Cameroon |
| 1980s | 0.0158 current US$ per square kilometre | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.0158 current US$ per square kilometre | Cameroon |
| 1990s | 1.61 current US$ per square kilometre | 4.13 current US$ per square kilometre | 2.52 current US$ per square kilometre | Equatorial Guinea |
| 2000s | 9.02 current US$ per square kilometre | 27.45 current US$ per square kilometre | 18.43 current US$ per square kilometre | Equatorial Guinea |
| 2010s | 26.8 current US$ per square kilometre | 41.1 current US$ per square kilometre | 14.3 current US$ per square kilometre | Equatorial Guinea |
| 2020s | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square, Cameroon or Equatorial Guinea?
- Cameroon, at 0 current US$ per square kilometre against 0 current US$ per square kilometre in Equatorial Guinea as of 2021.
- What is the difference in adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square between Cameroon and Equatorial Guinea?
- 0 current US$ per square kilometre, with Cameroon ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cameroon and Equatorial Guinea?
- 52 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2021.
- How do Cameroon and Equatorial Guinea rank globally for adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square?
- Cameroon ranks 93rd and Equatorial Guinea ranks 93rd of 216 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.