How many years of comparable data are there for Cameroon and Croatia?

30 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2021.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Cameroon vs Croatia: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square

Cameroon

0 current US$ per square kilometre

in 2021

Croatia

0 current US$ per square kilometre

in 2021

Cameroon rank

93rd

Croatia rank

93rd

Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square over time

Cameroon
Croatia

How they compare

Cameroon currently reports 0 current US$ per square kilometre against 0 current US$ per square kilometre in Croatia, a difference of 0 current US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 30 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Croatia ahead.

Cameroon ranks 93rd and Croatia ranks 93rd of 216 countries.

Cameroon has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Cameroon	Croatia	Difference	Ahead
1990s	2.01 current US$ per square kilometre	0.0857 current US$ per square kilometre	1.92 current US$ per square kilometre	Cameroon
2000s	9.02 current US$ per square kilometre	0.0005 current US$ per square kilometre	9.02 current US$ per square kilometre	Cameroon
2010s	26.8 current US$ per square kilometre	0.1162 current US$ per square kilometre	26.68 current US$ per square kilometre	Cameroon
2020s	0 current US$ per square kilometre	0 current US$ per square kilometre	0 current US$ per square kilometre	—

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square, Cameroon or Croatia?: Cameroon, at 0 current US$ per square kilometre against 0 current US$ per square kilometre in Croatia as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square between Cameroon and Croatia?: 0 current US$ per square kilometre, with Cameroon ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cameroon and Croatia?: 30 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2021.
How do Cameroon and Croatia rank globally for adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square?: Cameroon ranks 93rd and Croatia ranks 93rd of 216 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cameroon vs Croatia: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-mineral-depletion-current-us-per-square-kilometre/cameroon/croatia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-mineral-depletion-current-us-per-square-kilometre/cameroon/croatia/">Cameroon vs Croatia: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit: current US$ per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 217 places, 10,348 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed: 26 September 2026

Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.