Burundi vs Congo: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square

Burundi
0 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Congo
0 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Burundi rank
93rd
Congo rank
93rd

Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square over time

  • Burundi
  • Congo
0100200300197019952021

How they compare

Burundi currently reports 0 current US$ per square kilometre against 0 current US$ per square kilometre in Congo, a difference of 0 current US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 10 times across 52 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Congo ahead.

Burundi ranks 93rd and Congo ranks 93rd of 216 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Burundi averaged higher in 4 and Congo in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Burundi Congo Difference Ahead
1970s 4.26 current US$ per square kilometre 3.6 current US$ per square kilometre 0.6603 current US$ per square kilometre Burundi
1980s 2.26 current US$ per square kilometre 3.56 current US$ per square kilometre 1.3 current US$ per square kilometre Congo
1990s 31.59 current US$ per square kilometre 5.96 current US$ per square kilometre 25.63 current US$ per square kilometre Burundi
2000s 69.28 current US$ per square kilometre 0.7105 current US$ per square kilometre 68.56 current US$ per square kilometre Burundi
2010s 147.68 current US$ per square kilometre 3.43 current US$ per square kilometre 144.25 current US$ per square kilometre Burundi
2020s 0 current US$ per square kilometre 0 current US$ per square kilometre 0 current US$ per square kilometre —

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square, Burundi or Congo?
Burundi, at 0 current US$ per square kilometre against 0 current US$ per square kilometre in Congo as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square between Burundi and Congo?
0 current US$ per square kilometre, with Burundi ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Burundi and Congo?
52 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2021.
How do Burundi and Congo rank globally for adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square?
Burundi ranks 93rd and Congo ranks 93rd of 216 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Burundi vs Congo: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-mineral-depletion-current-us-per-square-kilometre/burundi/congo-rep/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-mineral-depletion-current-us-per-square-kilometre/burundi/congo-rep/">Burundi vs Congo: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
217 places, 10,348 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.