Brazil vs Georgia: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square

Brazil
2,778 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Georgia
2,655 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Brazil rank
36th
Georgia rank
38th

Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square over time

  • Brazil
  • Georgia
01.0k2.0k3.0k197019952021

How they compare

Brazil currently reports 2,778 current US$ per square kilometre against 2,655 current US$ per square kilometre in Georgia, a difference of 123 current US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 10 times across 30 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Brazil ahead.

Brazil ranks 36th and Georgia ranks 38th of 216 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Brazil averaged higher in 2 and Georgia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Brazil Georgia Difference Ahead
1990s 93.45 current US$ per square kilometre 32.1 current US$ per square kilometre 61.35 current US$ per square kilometre Brazil
2000s 469.24 current US$ per square kilometre 250.83 current US$ per square kilometre 218.4 current US$ per square kilometre Brazil
2010s 1,044 current US$ per square kilometre 1,071 current US$ per square kilometre 26.6 current US$ per square kilometre Georgia
2020s 1,698 current US$ per square kilometre 2,019 current US$ per square kilometre 320.55 current US$ per square kilometre Georgia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square, Brazil or Georgia?
Brazil, at 2,778 current US$ per square kilometre against 2,655 current US$ per square kilometre in Georgia as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square between Brazil and Georgia?
123 current US$ per square kilometre, with Brazil ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Georgia?
30 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2021.
How do Brazil and Georgia rank globally for adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square?
Brazil ranks 36th and Georgia ranks 38th of 216 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Brazil vs Georgia: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-mineral-depletion-current-us-per-square-kilometre/brazil/georgia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-mineral-depletion-current-us-per-square-kilometre/brazil/georgia/">Brazil vs Georgia: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
217 places, 10,348 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.