Botswana vs Uruguay: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square
Botswana
55.74 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Uruguay
32.03 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Botswana rank
80th
Uruguay rank
82nd
Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square over time
- Botswana
- Uruguay
How they compare
Botswana currently reports 55.74 current US$ per square kilometre against 32.03 current US$ per square kilometre in Uruguay, a difference of 23.71 current US$ per square kilometre.
That makes Botswana's figure about 1.7 times Uruguay's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 52 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Uruguay ahead.
Botswana ranks 80th and Uruguay ranks 82nd of 216 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Botswana averaged higher in 5 and Uruguay in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Botswana | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 8.66 current US$ per square kilometre | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | 8.66 current US$ per square kilometre | Botswana |
| 1980s | 41.98 current US$ per square kilometre | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | 41.98 current US$ per square kilometre | Botswana |
| 1990s | 48.63 current US$ per square kilometre | 5.73 current US$ per square kilometre | 42.9 current US$ per square kilometre | Botswana |
| 2000s | 308.11 current US$ per square kilometre | 73.53 current US$ per square kilometre | 234.57 current US$ per square kilometre | Botswana |
| 2010s | 76.95 current US$ per square kilometre | 104.77 current US$ per square kilometre | 27.82 current US$ per square kilometre | Uruguay |
| 2020s | 34.6 current US$ per square kilometre | 16.01 current US$ per square kilometre | 18.59 current US$ per square kilometre | Botswana |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square, Botswana or Uruguay?
- Botswana, at 55.74 current US$ per square kilometre against 32.03 current US$ per square kilometre in Uruguay as of 2021.
- What is the difference in adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square between Botswana and Uruguay?
- 23.71 current US$ per square kilometre, with Botswana ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Uruguay?
- 52 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2021.
- How do Botswana and Uruguay rank globally for adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square?
- Botswana ranks 80th and Uruguay ranks 82nd of 216 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.