Botswana vs Sierra Leone: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square

Botswana
55.74 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Sierra Leone
92.35 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Botswana rank
80th
Sierra Leone rank
77th

Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square over time

  • Botswana
  • Sierra Leone
0200400600800197019952021

How they compare

Sierra Leone currently reports 92.35 current US$ per square kilometre against 55.74 current US$ per square kilometre in Botswana, a difference of 36.61 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Sierra Leone's figure about 1.7 times Botswana's.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 52 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Sierra Leone ahead.

Botswana ranks 80th and Sierra Leone ranks 77th of 216 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Botswana averaged higher in 2 and Sierra Leone in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Botswana Sierra Leone Difference Ahead
1970s 8.66 current US$ per square kilometre 32.5 current US$ per square kilometre 23.84 current US$ per square kilometre Sierra Leone
1980s 41.98 current US$ per square kilometre 62.8 current US$ per square kilometre 20.82 current US$ per square kilometre Sierra Leone
1990s 48.63 current US$ per square kilometre 29.08 current US$ per square kilometre 19.55 current US$ per square kilometre Botswana
2000s 308.11 current US$ per square kilometre 20.98 current US$ per square kilometre 287.12 current US$ per square kilometre Botswana
2010s 76.95 current US$ per square kilometre 118.79 current US$ per square kilometre 41.84 current US$ per square kilometre Sierra Leone
2020s 34.6 current US$ per square kilometre 47.05 current US$ per square kilometre 12.45 current US$ per square kilometre Sierra Leone

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square, Botswana or Sierra Leone?
Sierra Leone, at 92.35 current US$ per square kilometre against 55.74 current US$ per square kilometre in Botswana as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square between Botswana and Sierra Leone?
36.61 current US$ per square kilometre, with Sierra Leone ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Sierra Leone?
52 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2021.
How do Botswana and Sierra Leone rank globally for adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square?
Botswana ranks 80th and Sierra Leone ranks 77th of 216 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Botswana vs Sierra Leone: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-mineral-depletion-current-us-per-square-kilometre/botswana/sierra-leone/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-mineral-depletion-current-us-per-square-kilometre/botswana/sierra-leone/">Botswana vs Sierra Leone: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
217 places, 10,348 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.