Botswana vs Montenegro: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square

Botswana
55.74 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Montenegro
48.44 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Botswana rank
80th
Montenegro rank
81st

Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square over time

  • Botswana
  • Montenegro
02505007501.0k1.2k197019952021

How they compare

Botswana currently reports 55.74 current US$ per square kilometre against 48.44 current US$ per square kilometre in Montenegro, a difference of 7.3 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Botswana's figure about 1.2 times Montenegro's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 16 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Botswana ahead.

Botswana ranks 80th and Montenegro ranks 81st of 216 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Botswana averaged higher in 1 and Montenegro in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Botswana Montenegro Difference Ahead
2000s 548.17 current US$ per square kilometre 34.45 current US$ per square kilometre 513.73 current US$ per square kilometre Botswana
2010s 76.95 current US$ per square kilometre 374.57 current US$ per square kilometre 297.62 current US$ per square kilometre Montenegro
2020s 34.6 current US$ per square kilometre 45.88 current US$ per square kilometre 11.28 current US$ per square kilometre Montenegro

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square, Botswana or Montenegro?
Botswana, at 55.74 current US$ per square kilometre against 48.44 current US$ per square kilometre in Montenegro as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square between Botswana and Montenegro?
7.3 current US$ per square kilometre, with Botswana ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Montenegro?
16 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2021.
How do Botswana and Montenegro rank globally for adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square?
Botswana ranks 80th and Montenegro ranks 81st of 216 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Botswana vs Montenegro: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-mineral-depletion-current-us-per-square-kilometre/botswana/montenegro/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-mineral-depletion-current-us-per-square-kilometre/botswana/montenegro/">Botswana vs Montenegro: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
217 places, 10,348 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.