Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Pakistan: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square

Bosnia and Herzegovina
142.68 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Pakistan
99.1 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
75th
Pakistan rank
76th

Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square over time

  • Bosnia and Herzegovina
  • Pakistan
0200400600197019952021

How they compare

Bosnia and Herzegovina currently reports 142.68 current US$ per square kilometre against 99.1 current US$ per square kilometre in Pakistan, a difference of 43.58 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Bosnia and Herzegovina's figure about 1.4 times Pakistan's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 30 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.

Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 75th and Pakistan ranks 76th of 216 countries.

Bosnia and Herzegovina has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bosnia and Herzegovina Pakistan Difference Ahead
1990s 5.08 current US$ per square kilometre 0.7584 current US$ per square kilometre 4.33 current US$ per square kilometre Bosnia and Herzegovina
2000s 108.19 current US$ per square kilometre 24.87 current US$ per square kilometre 83.32 current US$ per square kilometre Bosnia and Herzegovina
2010s 359.76 current US$ per square kilometre 57.57 current US$ per square kilometre 302.19 current US$ per square kilometre Bosnia and Herzegovina
2020s 114.17 current US$ per square kilometre 71.01 current US$ per square kilometre 43.15 current US$ per square kilometre Bosnia and Herzegovina

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square, Bosnia and Herzegovina or Pakistan?
Bosnia and Herzegovina, at 142.68 current US$ per square kilometre against 99.1 current US$ per square kilometre in Pakistan as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Pakistan?
43.58 current US$ per square kilometre, with Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Pakistan?
30 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2021.
How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Pakistan rank globally for adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square?
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 75th and Pakistan ranks 76th of 216 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Pakistan: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-mineral-depletion-current-us-per-square-kilometre/bosnia-and-herzegovina/pakistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-mineral-depletion-current-us-per-square-kilometre/bosnia-and-herzegovina/pakistan/">Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Pakistan: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
217 places, 10,348 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.