Bolivia vs Serbia: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square

Bolivia
1,691 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Serbia
1,714 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Bolivia rank
48th
Serbia rank
47th

Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square over time

  • Bolivia
  • Serbia
05001.0k1.5k197019952021

How they compare

Serbia currently reports 1,714 current US$ per square kilometre against 1,691 current US$ per square kilometre in Bolivia, a difference of 23 current US$ per square kilometre.

Across all 16 years both countries report, Serbia has been ahead every year.

Bolivia ranks 48th and Serbia ranks 47th of 216 countries.

Serbia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bolivia Serbia Difference Ahead
2000s 317.54 current US$ per square kilometre 401.19 current US$ per square kilometre 83.65 current US$ per square kilometre Serbia
2010s 424.11 current US$ per square kilometre 735.79 current US$ per square kilometre 311.68 current US$ per square kilometre Serbia
2020s 901.96 current US$ per square kilometre 1,062 current US$ per square kilometre 160.21 current US$ per square kilometre Serbia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square, Bolivia or Serbia?
Serbia, at 1,714 current US$ per square kilometre against 1,691 current US$ per square kilometre in Bolivia as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square between Bolivia and Serbia?
23 current US$ per square kilometre, with Serbia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bolivia and Serbia?
16 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2021.
How do Bolivia and Serbia rank globally for adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square?
Bolivia ranks 48th and Serbia ranks 47th of 216 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bolivia vs Serbia: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-mineral-depletion-current-us-per-square-kilometre/bolivia/serbia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-mineral-depletion-current-us-per-square-kilometre/bolivia/serbia/">Bolivia vs Serbia: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
217 places, 10,348 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.