Bolivia vs Liberia: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square

Bolivia
1,691 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Liberia
1,535 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Bolivia rank
48th
Liberia rank
51st

Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square over time

  • Bolivia
  • Liberia
05001.0k1.5k197019952021

How they compare

Bolivia currently reports 1,691 current US$ per square kilometre against 1,535 current US$ per square kilometre in Liberia, a difference of 156 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Bolivia's figure about 1.1 times Liberia's.

The two have swapped places 9 times across 52 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Liberia ahead.

Bolivia ranks 48th and Liberia ranks 51st of 216 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Bolivia averaged higher in 4 and Liberia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bolivia Liberia Difference Ahead
1970s 28.77 current US$ per square kilometre 40.57 current US$ per square kilometre 11.8 current US$ per square kilometre Liberia
1980s 40.28 current US$ per square kilometre 53.69 current US$ per square kilometre 13.41 current US$ per square kilometre Liberia
1990s 49.37 current US$ per square kilometre 7.79 current US$ per square kilometre 41.58 current US$ per square kilometre Bolivia
2000s 140.97 current US$ per square kilometre 9.1 current US$ per square kilometre 131.87 current US$ per square kilometre Bolivia
2010s 424.11 current US$ per square kilometre 77.36 current US$ per square kilometre 346.75 current US$ per square kilometre Bolivia
2020s 901.96 current US$ per square kilometre 767.3 current US$ per square kilometre 134.65 current US$ per square kilometre Bolivia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square, Bolivia or Liberia?
Bolivia, at 1,691 current US$ per square kilometre against 1,535 current US$ per square kilometre in Liberia as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square between Bolivia and Liberia?
156 current US$ per square kilometre, with Bolivia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bolivia and Liberia?
52 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2021.
How do Bolivia and Liberia rank globally for adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square?
Bolivia ranks 48th and Liberia ranks 51st of 216 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bolivia vs Liberia: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-mineral-depletion-current-us-per-square-kilometre/bolivia/liberia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-mineral-depletion-current-us-per-square-kilometre/bolivia/liberia/">Bolivia vs Liberia: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
217 places, 10,348 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.