Bhutan vs United Kingdom: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square

Bhutan
4.09 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
United Kingdom
5.77 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Bhutan rank
90th
United Kingdom rank
89th

Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square over time

  • Bhutan
  • United Kingdom
0204060197019952021

How they compare

United Kingdom currently reports 5.77 current US$ per square kilometre against 4.09 current US$ per square kilometre in Bhutan, a difference of 1.68 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes United Kingdom's figure about 1.4 times Bhutan's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 52 shared years of data; in 1970 it was United Kingdom ahead.

Bhutan ranks 90th and United Kingdom ranks 89th of 216 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Bhutan averaged higher in 1 and United Kingdom in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bhutan United Kingdom Difference Ahead
1970s 0 current US$ per square kilometre 11.27 current US$ per square kilometre 11.27 current US$ per square kilometre United Kingdom
1980s 0 current US$ per square kilometre 20.1 current US$ per square kilometre 20.1 current US$ per square kilometre United Kingdom
1990s 0 current US$ per square kilometre 1.1 current US$ per square kilometre 1.1 current US$ per square kilometre United Kingdom
2000s 0.1627 current US$ per square kilometre 2.02 current US$ per square kilometre 1.86 current US$ per square kilometre United Kingdom
2010s 5.45 current US$ per square kilometre 4.91 current US$ per square kilometre 0.5385 current US$ per square kilometre Bhutan
2020s 3.65 current US$ per square kilometre 4.05 current US$ per square kilometre 0.4017 current US$ per square kilometre United Kingdom

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square, Bhutan or United Kingdom?
United Kingdom, at 5.77 current US$ per square kilometre against 4.09 current US$ per square kilometre in Bhutan as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square between Bhutan and United Kingdom?
1.68 current US$ per square kilometre, with United Kingdom ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bhutan and United Kingdom?
52 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2021.
How do Bhutan and United Kingdom rank globally for adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square?
Bhutan ranks 90th and United Kingdom ranks 89th of 216 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bhutan vs United Kingdom: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-mineral-depletion-current-us-per-square-kilometre/bhutan/united-kingdom/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-mineral-depletion-current-us-per-square-kilometre/bhutan/united-kingdom/">Bhutan vs United Kingdom: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
217 places, 10,348 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.