Argentina vs Sudan: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square

Argentina
797.72 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Sudan
944.81 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Argentina rank
57th
Sudan rank
56th

Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square over time

  • Argentina
  • Sudan
02004006008001.0k197019952021

How they compare

Sudan currently reports 944.81 current US$ per square kilometre against 797.72 current US$ per square kilometre in Argentina, a difference of 147.09 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Sudan's figure about 1.2 times Argentina's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Argentina ahead.

Argentina ranks 57th and Sudan ranks 56th of 216 countries.

Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Argentina Sudan Difference Ahead
2010s 253.47 current US$ per square kilometre 307.41 current US$ per square kilometre 53.93 current US$ per square kilometre Sudan
2020s 518.19 current US$ per square kilometre 688.41 current US$ per square kilometre 170.22 current US$ per square kilometre Sudan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square, Argentina or Sudan?
Sudan, at 944.81 current US$ per square kilometre against 797.72 current US$ per square kilometre in Argentina as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square between Argentina and Sudan?
147.09 current US$ per square kilometre, with Sudan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Sudan?
10 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2021.
How do Argentina and Sudan rank globally for adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square?
Argentina ranks 57th and Sudan ranks 56th of 216 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Argentina vs Sudan: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-mineral-depletion-current-us-per-square-kilometre/argentina/sudan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-mineral-depletion-current-us-per-square-kilometre/argentina/sudan/">Argentina vs Sudan: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
217 places, 10,348 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.