Angola vs Equatorial Guinea: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square
Angola
0 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Equatorial Guinea
0 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Angola rank
93rd
Equatorial Guinea rank
93rd
Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square over time
- Angola
- Equatorial Guinea
How they compare
Angola currently reports 0 current US$ per square kilometre against 0 current US$ per square kilometre in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 0 current US$ per square kilometre.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 52 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Angola ahead.
Angola ranks 93rd and Equatorial Guinea ranks 93rd of 216 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Angola averaged higher in 1 and Equatorial Guinea in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Angola | Equatorial Guinea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 1.19 current US$ per square kilometre | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.19 current US$ per square kilometre | Angola |
| 1980s | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1990s | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | 4.13 current US$ per square kilometre | 4.13 current US$ per square kilometre | Equatorial Guinea |
| 2000s | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | 27.45 current US$ per square kilometre | 27.45 current US$ per square kilometre | Equatorial Guinea |
| 2010s | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | 41.1 current US$ per square kilometre | 41.1 current US$ per square kilometre | Equatorial Guinea |
| 2020s | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square, Angola or Equatorial Guinea?
- Angola, at 0 current US$ per square kilometre against 0 current US$ per square kilometre in Equatorial Guinea as of 2021.
- What is the difference in adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square between Angola and Equatorial Guinea?
- 0 current US$ per square kilometre, with Angola ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Equatorial Guinea?
- 52 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2021.
- How do Angola and Equatorial Guinea rank globally for adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square?
- Angola ranks 93rd and Equatorial Guinea ranks 93rd of 216 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.