Angola vs Croatia: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square

Angola
0 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Croatia
0 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Angola rank
93rd
Croatia rank
93rd

Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square over time

  • Angola
  • Croatia
00.511.522.5197019952021

How they compare

Angola currently reports 0 current US$ per square kilometre against 0 current US$ per square kilometre in Croatia, a difference of 0 current US$ per square kilometre.

Across all 30 years both countries report, Croatia has been ahead every year.

Angola ranks 93rd and Croatia ranks 93rd of 216 countries.

Croatia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Angola Croatia Difference Ahead
1990s 0 current US$ per square kilometre 0.0857 current US$ per square kilometre 0.0857 current US$ per square kilometre Croatia
2000s 0 current US$ per square kilometre 0.0005 current US$ per square kilometre 0.0005 current US$ per square kilometre Croatia
2010s 0 current US$ per square kilometre 0.1162 current US$ per square kilometre 0.1162 current US$ per square kilometre Croatia
2020s 0 current US$ per square kilometre 0 current US$ per square kilometre 0 current US$ per square kilometre —

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square, Angola or Croatia?
Angola, at 0 current US$ per square kilometre against 0 current US$ per square kilometre in Croatia as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square between Angola and Croatia?
0 current US$ per square kilometre, with Angola ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Croatia?
30 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2021.
How do Angola and Croatia rank globally for adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square?
Angola ranks 93rd and Croatia ranks 93rd of 216 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Angola vs Croatia: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-mineral-depletion-current-us-per-square-kilometre/angola/croatia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-mineral-depletion-current-us-per-square-kilometre/angola/croatia/">Angola vs Croatia: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
217 places, 10,348 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.