How many years of comparable data are there for Uganda and United Kingdom?

52 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2021.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Uganda vs United Kingdom: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per capita

Uganda

0 current US$ per person

in 2021

United Kingdom

0.0208 current US$ per person

in 2021

Uganda rank

95th

United Kingdom rank

93rd

Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per capita over time

Uganda
United Kingdom

How they compare

United Kingdom currently reports 0.0208 current US$ per person against 0 current US$ per person in Uganda, a difference of 0.0208 current US$ per person.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 52 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Uganda ahead.

Uganda ranks 95th and United Kingdom ranks 93rd of 218 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Uganda averaged higher in 3 and United Kingdom in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Uganda	United Kingdom	Difference	Ahead
1970s	0.4469 current US$ per person	0.0485 current US$ per person	0.3984 current US$ per person	Uganda
1980s	0.0044 current US$ per person	0.0861 current US$ per person	0.0816 current US$ per person	United Kingdom
1990s	0.0001 current US$ per person	0.0046 current US$ per person	0.0046 current US$ per person	United Kingdom
2000s	0.0866 current US$ per person	0.0079 current US$ per person	0.0787 current US$ per person	Uganda
2010s	0.292 current US$ per person	0.0187 current US$ per person	0.2733 current US$ per person	Uganda
2020s	0 current US$ per person	0.0146 current US$ per person	0.0146 current US$ per person	United Kingdom

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per capita, Uganda or United Kingdom?: United Kingdom, at 0.0208 current US$ per person against 0 current US$ per person in Uganda as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per capita between Uganda and United Kingdom?: 0.0208 current US$ per person, with United Kingdom ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Uganda and United Kingdom?: 52 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2021.
How do Uganda and United Kingdom rank globally for adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per capita?: Uganda ranks 95th and United Kingdom ranks 93rd of 218 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Uganda vs United Kingdom: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-mineral-depletion-current-us-per-capita/uganda/united-kingdom/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-mineral-depletion-current-us-per-capita/uganda/united-kingdom/">Uganda vs United Kingdom: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per capita
Unit: current US$ per person
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 219 places, 11,365 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed: 26 September 2026

Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.