Rwanda vs Tunisia: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per capita

Rwanda
0 current US$ per person
in 2021
Tunisia
0 current US$ per person
in 2021
Rwanda rank
95th
Tunisia rank
95th

Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per capita over time

  • Rwanda
  • Tunisia
0255075100125197019952021

How they compare

Rwanda currently reports 0 current US$ per person against 0 current US$ per person in Tunisia, a difference of 0 current US$ per person.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 52 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Tunisia ahead.

Rwanda ranks 95th and Tunisia ranks 95th of 218 countries.

Tunisia has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Rwanda Tunisia Difference Ahead
1970s 0.3163 current US$ per person 3.6 current US$ per person 3.29 current US$ per person Tunisia
1980s 0.3048 current US$ per person 1 current US$ per person 0.696 current US$ per person Tunisia
1990s 0.0129 current US$ per person 0.2823 current US$ per person 0.2694 current US$ per person Tunisia
2000s 0.1033 current US$ per person 22.87 current US$ per person 22.77 current US$ per person Tunisia
2010s 0.3743 current US$ per person 13.32 current US$ per person 12.95 current US$ per person Tunisia
2020s 0 current US$ per person 0 current US$ per person 0 current US$ per person —

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per capita, Rwanda or Tunisia?
Rwanda, at 0 current US$ per person against 0 current US$ per person in Tunisia as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per capita between Rwanda and Tunisia?
0 current US$ per person, with Rwanda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Rwanda and Tunisia?
52 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2021.
How do Rwanda and Tunisia rank globally for adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per capita?
Rwanda ranks 95th and Tunisia ranks 95th of 218 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Rwanda vs Tunisia: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-mineral-depletion-current-us-per-capita/rwanda/tunisia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-mineral-depletion-current-us-per-capita/rwanda/tunisia/">Rwanda vs Tunisia: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per capita
Unit
current US$ per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
219 places, 11,365 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.