Rwanda vs Sri Lanka: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per capita

Rwanda
0 current US$ per person
in 2021
Sri Lanka
0 current US$ per person
in 2021
Rwanda rank
95th
Sri Lanka rank
95th

Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per capita over time

  • Rwanda
  • Sri Lanka
00.511.52197019952021

How they compare

Rwanda currently reports 0 current US$ per person against 0 current US$ per person in Sri Lanka, a difference of 0 current US$ per person.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 52 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Rwanda ahead.

Rwanda ranks 95th and Sri Lanka ranks 95th of 218 countries.

Rwanda has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Rwanda Sri Lanka Difference Ahead
1970s 0.3163 current US$ per person 0 current US$ per person 0.3163 current US$ per person Rwanda
1980s 0.3048 current US$ per person 0.0006 current US$ per person 0.3043 current US$ per person Rwanda
1990s 0.0129 current US$ per person 0 current US$ per person 0.0129 current US$ per person Rwanda
2000s 0.1033 current US$ per person 0.0216 current US$ per person 0.0818 current US$ per person Rwanda
2010s 0.3743 current US$ per person 0.0443 current US$ per person 0.3299 current US$ per person Rwanda
2020s 0 current US$ per person 0 current US$ per person 0 current US$ per person —

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per capita, Rwanda or Sri Lanka?
Rwanda, at 0 current US$ per person against 0 current US$ per person in Sri Lanka as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per capita between Rwanda and Sri Lanka?
0 current US$ per person, with Rwanda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Rwanda and Sri Lanka?
52 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2021.
How do Rwanda and Sri Lanka rank globally for adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per capita?
Rwanda ranks 95th and Sri Lanka ranks 95th of 218 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Rwanda vs Sri Lanka: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-mineral-depletion-current-us-per-capita/rwanda/sri-lanka/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-mineral-depletion-current-us-per-capita/rwanda/sri-lanka/">Rwanda vs Sri Lanka: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per capita
Unit
current US$ per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
219 places, 11,365 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.