Papua New Guinea vs Sweden: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per capita

Papua New Guinea
233.05 current US$ per person
in 2021
Sweden
348.87 current US$ per person
in 2021
Papua New Guinea rank
10th
Sweden rank
9th

Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per capita over time

  • Papua New Guinea
  • Sweden
0100200300197019952021

How they compare

Sweden currently reports 348.87 current US$ per person against 233.05 current US$ per person in Papua New Guinea, a difference of 115.82 current US$ per person.

That makes Sweden's figure about 1.5 times Papua New Guinea's.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 52 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Sweden ahead.

Papua New Guinea ranks 10th and Sweden ranks 9th of 218 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Papua New Guinea averaged higher in 4 and Sweden in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Papua New Guinea Sweden Difference Ahead
1970s 45.9 current US$ per person 5.78 current US$ per person 40.12 current US$ per person Papua New Guinea
1980s 88.38 current US$ per person 11.15 current US$ per person 77.23 current US$ per person Papua New Guinea
1990s 55.14 current US$ per person 8.87 current US$ per person 46.27 current US$ per person Papua New Guinea
2000s 67.91 current US$ per person 31.86 current US$ per person 36.05 current US$ per person Papua New Guinea
2010s 73.9 current US$ per person 90.27 current US$ per person 16.37 current US$ per person Sweden
2020s 141.04 current US$ per person 203.8 current US$ per person 62.77 current US$ per person Sweden

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per capita, Papua New Guinea or Sweden?
Sweden, at 348.87 current US$ per person against 233.05 current US$ per person in Papua New Guinea as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per capita between Papua New Guinea and Sweden?
115.82 current US$ per person, with Sweden ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Papua New Guinea and Sweden?
52 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2021.
How do Papua New Guinea and Sweden rank globally for adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per capita?
Papua New Guinea ranks 10th and Sweden ranks 9th of 218 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Papua New Guinea vs Sweden: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-mineral-depletion-current-us-per-capita/papua-new-guinea/sweden/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-mineral-depletion-current-us-per-capita/papua-new-guinea/sweden/">Papua New Guinea vs Sweden: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per capita
Unit
current US$ per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
219 places, 11,365 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.