Panama vs Papua New Guinea: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per capita

Panama
181.7 current US$ per person
in 2021
Papua New Guinea
233.05 current US$ per person
in 2021
Panama rank
12th
Papua New Guinea rank
10th

Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per capita over time

  • Panama
  • Papua New Guinea
050100150200250197019952021

How they compare

Papua New Guinea currently reports 233.05 current US$ per person against 181.7 current US$ per person in Panama, a difference of 51.35 current US$ per person.

That makes Papua New Guinea's figure about 1.3 times Panama's.

Across all 52 years both countries report, Papua New Guinea has been ahead every year.

Panama ranks 12th and Papua New Guinea ranks 10th of 218 countries.

Papua New Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Panama Papua New Guinea Difference Ahead
1970s 0 current US$ per person 45.9 current US$ per person 45.9 current US$ per person Papua New Guinea
1980s 0 current US$ per person 88.38 current US$ per person 88.38 current US$ per person Papua New Guinea
1990s 0.1034 current US$ per person 55.14 current US$ per person 55.04 current US$ per person Papua New Guinea
2000s 0.7335 current US$ per person 67.91 current US$ per person 67.18 current US$ per person Papua New Guinea
2010s 6.33 current US$ per person 73.9 current US$ per person 67.57 current US$ per person Papua New Guinea
2020s 99.86 current US$ per person 141.04 current US$ per person 41.17 current US$ per person Papua New Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per capita, Panama or Papua New Guinea?
Papua New Guinea, at 233.05 current US$ per person against 181.7 current US$ per person in Panama as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per capita between Panama and Papua New Guinea?
51.35 current US$ per person, with Papua New Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Panama and Papua New Guinea?
52 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2021.
How do Panama and Papua New Guinea rank globally for adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per capita?
Panama ranks 12th and Papua New Guinea ranks 10th of 218 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Panama vs Papua New Guinea: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-mineral-depletion-current-us-per-capita/panama/papua-new-guinea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-mineral-depletion-current-us-per-capita/panama/papua-new-guinea/">Panama vs Papua New Guinea: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per capita
Unit
current US$ per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
219 places, 11,365 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.