Kyrgyzstan vs Namibia: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per capita

Kyrgyzstan
105.63 current US$ per person
in 2021
Namibia
93.5 current US$ per person
in 2021
Kyrgyzstan rank
25th
Namibia rank
27th

Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per capita over time

  • Kyrgyzstan
  • Namibia
0100200300400197019952021

How they compare

Kyrgyzstan currently reports 105.63 current US$ per person against 93.5 current US$ per person in Namibia, a difference of 12.13 current US$ per person.

That makes Kyrgyzstan's figure about 1.1 times Namibia's.

The two have swapped places 9 times across 52 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Namibia ahead.

Kyrgyzstan ranks 25th and Namibia ranks 27th of 218 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Kyrgyzstan averaged higher in 2 and Namibia in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Kyrgyzstan Namibia Difference Ahead
1970s 0 current US$ per person 35.53 current US$ per person 35.53 current US$ per person Namibia
1980s 0 current US$ per person 86.64 current US$ per person 86.64 current US$ per person Namibia
1990s 2.04 current US$ per person 12.61 current US$ per person 10.57 current US$ per person Namibia
2000s 9.57 current US$ per person 33.03 current US$ per person 23.45 current US$ per person Namibia
2010s 52.67 current US$ per person 43.63 current US$ per person 9.04 current US$ per person Kyrgyzstan
2020s 79.37 current US$ per person 59.89 current US$ per person 19.48 current US$ per person Kyrgyzstan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per capita, Kyrgyzstan or Namibia?
Kyrgyzstan, at 105.63 current US$ per person against 93.5 current US$ per person in Namibia as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per capita between Kyrgyzstan and Namibia?
12.13 current US$ per person, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kyrgyzstan and Namibia?
52 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2021.
How do Kyrgyzstan and Namibia rank globally for adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per capita?
Kyrgyzstan ranks 25th and Namibia ranks 27th of 218 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Kyrgyzstan vs Namibia: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-mineral-depletion-current-us-per-capita/kyrgyz-republic/namibia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-mineral-depletion-current-us-per-capita/kyrgyz-republic/namibia/">Kyrgyzstan vs Namibia: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per capita
Unit
current US$ per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
219 places, 11,365 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.