Hong Kong vs Norway: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per capita

Hong Kong
0 current US$ per person
in 2021
Norway
0 current US$ per person
in 2021
Hong Kong rank
95th
Norway rank
95th

Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per capita over time

  • Hong Kong
  • Norway
02468197019952021

How they compare

Hong Kong currently reports 0 current US$ per person against 0 current US$ per person in Norway, a difference of 0 current US$ per person.

Across all 52 years both countries report, Norway has been ahead every year.

Hong Kong ranks 95th and Norway ranks 95th of 218 countries.

Norway has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Hong Kong Norway Difference Ahead
1970s 0.0039 current US$ per person 3.69 current US$ per person 3.69 current US$ per person Norway
1980s 0.0015 current US$ per person 2.66 current US$ per person 2.66 current US$ per person Norway
1990s 0 current US$ per person 1.87 current US$ per person 1.87 current US$ per person Norway
2000s 0 current US$ per person 0.6603 current US$ per person 0.6603 current US$ per person Norway
2010s 0 current US$ per person 3.51 current US$ per person 3.51 current US$ per person Norway
2020s 0 current US$ per person 0 current US$ per person 0 current US$ per person —

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per capita, Hong Kong or Norway?
Hong Kong, at 0 current US$ per person against 0 current US$ per person in Norway as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per capita between Hong Kong and Norway?
0 current US$ per person, with Hong Kong ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong and Norway?
52 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2021.
How do Hong Kong and Norway rank globally for adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per capita?
Hong Kong ranks 95th and Norway ranks 95th of 218 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Hong Kong vs Norway: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-mineral-depletion-current-us-per-capita/hong-kong-sar-china/norway/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-mineral-depletion-current-us-per-capita/hong-kong-sar-china/norway/">Hong Kong vs Norway: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per capita
Unit
current US$ per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
219 places, 11,365 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.