How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong and Nepal?

52 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2021.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Hong Kong vs Nepal: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per capita

Hong Kong

0 current US$ per person

in 2021

Nepal

0 current US$ per person

in 2021

Hong Kong rank

95th

Nepal rank

95th

Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per capita over time

Hong Kong
Nepal

How they compare

Hong Kong currently reports 0 current US$ per person against 0 current US$ per person in Nepal, a difference of 0 current US$ per person.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 52 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Hong Kong ahead.

Hong Kong ranks 95th and Nepal ranks 95th of 218 countries.

Nepal has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Hong Kong	Nepal	Difference	Ahead
1970s	0.0039 current US$ per person	0.2063 current US$ per person	0.2023 current US$ per person	Nepal
1980s	0.0015 current US$ per person	0.1901 current US$ per person	0.1887 current US$ per person	Nepal
1990s	0 current US$ per person	0 current US$ per person	0 current US$ per person	—
2000s	0 current US$ per person	0 current US$ per person	0 current US$ per person	—
2010s	0 current US$ per person	0 current US$ per person	0 current US$ per person	Nepal
2020s	0 current US$ per person	0 current US$ per person	0 current US$ per person	—

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per capita, Hong Kong or Nepal?: Hong Kong, at 0 current US$ per person against 0 current US$ per person in Nepal as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per capita between Hong Kong and Nepal?: 0 current US$ per person, with Hong Kong ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong and Nepal?: 52 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2021.
How do Hong Kong and Nepal rank globally for adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per capita?: Hong Kong ranks 95th and Nepal ranks 95th of 218 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Hong Kong vs Nepal: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-mineral-depletion-current-us-per-capita/hong-kong-sar-china/nepal/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-mineral-depletion-current-us-per-capita/hong-kong-sar-china/nepal/">Hong Kong vs Nepal: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per capita
Unit: current US$ per person
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 219 places, 11,365 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed: 26 September 2026

Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.