How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong and Kenya?

52 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2021.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Hong Kong vs Kenya: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per capita

Hong Kong

0 current US$ per person

in 2021

Kenya

0.091 current US$ per person

in 2021

Hong Kong rank

95th

Kenya rank

92nd

Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per capita over time

Hong Kong
Kenya

How they compare

Kenya currently reports 0.091 current US$ per person against 0 current US$ per person in Hong Kong, a difference of 0.091 current US$ per person.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 52 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Hong Kong ahead.

Hong Kong ranks 95th and Kenya ranks 92nd of 218 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Hong Kong averaged higher in 1 and Kenya in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Hong Kong	Kenya	Difference	Ahead
1970s	0.0039 current US$ per person	0.0021 current US$ per person	0.0018 current US$ per person	Hong Kong
1980s	0.0015 current US$ per person	0.0035 current US$ per person	0.0021 current US$ per person	Kenya
1990s	0 current US$ per person	0.0143 current US$ per person	0.0143 current US$ per person	Kenya
2000s	0 current US$ per person	0.0943 current US$ per person	0.0943 current US$ per person	Kenya
2010s	0 current US$ per person	0.3086 current US$ per person	0.3086 current US$ per person	Kenya
2020s	0 current US$ per person	0.0584 current US$ per person	0.0584 current US$ per person	Kenya

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per capita, Hong Kong or Kenya?: Kenya, at 0.091 current US$ per person against 0 current US$ per person in Hong Kong as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per capita between Hong Kong and Kenya?: 0.091 current US$ per person, with Kenya ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong and Kenya?: 52 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2021.
How do Hong Kong and Kenya rank globally for adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per capita?: Hong Kong ranks 95th and Kenya ranks 92nd of 218 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Hong Kong vs Kenya: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-mineral-depletion-current-us-per-capita/hong-kong-sar-china/kenya/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-mineral-depletion-current-us-per-capita/hong-kong-sar-china/kenya/">Hong Kong vs Kenya: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per capita
Unit: current US$ per person
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 219 places, 11,365 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed: 26 September 2026

Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.