Greenland vs Suriname: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per capita
Greenland
0 current US$ per person
in 2021
Suriname
0 current US$ per person
in 2021
Greenland rank
95th
Suriname rank
95th
Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per capita over time
- Greenland
- Suriname
How they compare
Greenland currently reports 0 current US$ per person against 0 current US$ per person in Suriname, a difference of 0 current US$ per person.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 52 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Suriname ahead.
Greenland ranks 95th and Suriname ranks 95th of 218 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Greenland averaged higher in 3 and Suriname in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Greenland | Suriname | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 193.09 current US$ per person | 31.66 current US$ per person | 161.43 current US$ per person | Greenland |
| 1980s | 404.32 current US$ per person | 32.31 current US$ per person | 372 current US$ per person | Greenland |
| 1990s | 114.1 current US$ per person | 18.13 current US$ per person | 95.97 current US$ per person | Greenland |
| 2000s | 77.53 current US$ per person | 80.48 current US$ per person | 2.95 current US$ per person | Suriname |
| 2010s | 17.29 current US$ per person | 590.26 current US$ per person | 572.96 current US$ per person | Suriname |
| 2020s | 0 current US$ per person | 0 current US$ per person | 0 current US$ per person | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per capita, Greenland or Suriname?
- Greenland, at 0 current US$ per person against 0 current US$ per person in Suriname as of 2021.
- What is the difference in adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per capita between Greenland and Suriname?
- 0 current US$ per person, with Greenland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Greenland and Suriname?
- 52 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2021.
- How do Greenland and Suriname rank globally for adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per capita?
- Greenland ranks 95th and Suriname ranks 95th of 218 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.