Greenland vs Malawi: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per capita

Greenland
0 current US$ per person
in 2021
Malawi
0.0029 current US$ per person
in 2021
Greenland rank
95th
Malawi rank
94th

Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per capita over time

  • Greenland
  • Malawi
05001.0k1.5k2.0k197019952021

How they compare

Malawi currently reports 0.0029 current US$ per person against 0 current US$ per person in Greenland, a difference of 0.0029 current US$ per person.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 52 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Malawi ahead.

Greenland ranks 95th and Malawi ranks 94th of 218 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Greenland averaged higher in 5 and Malawi in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Greenland Malawi Difference Ahead
1970s 193.09 current US$ per person 0 current US$ per person 193.09 current US$ per person Greenland
1980s 404.32 current US$ per person 0 current US$ per person 404.32 current US$ per person Greenland
1990s 114.1 current US$ per person 0 current US$ per person 114.1 current US$ per person Greenland
2000s 77.53 current US$ per person 0 current US$ per person 77.53 current US$ per person Greenland
2010s 17.29 current US$ per person 0.0087 current US$ per person 17.28 current US$ per person Greenland
2020s 0 current US$ per person 0.0024 current US$ per person 0.0024 current US$ per person Malawi

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per capita, Greenland or Malawi?
Malawi, at 0.0029 current US$ per person against 0 current US$ per person in Greenland as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per capita between Greenland and Malawi?
0.0029 current US$ per person, with Malawi ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Greenland and Malawi?
52 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2021.
How do Greenland and Malawi rank globally for adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per capita?
Greenland ranks 95th and Malawi ranks 94th of 218 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Greenland vs Malawi: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-mineral-depletion-current-us-per-capita/greenland/malawi/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-mineral-depletion-current-us-per-capita/greenland/malawi/">Greenland vs Malawi: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per capita
Unit
current US$ per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
219 places, 11,365 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.