Equatorial Guinea vs Sri Lanka: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per capita
Equatorial Guinea
0 current US$ per person
in 2021
Sri Lanka
0 current US$ per person
in 2021
Equatorial Guinea rank
95th
Sri Lanka rank
95th
Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per capita over time
- Equatorial Guinea
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Equatorial Guinea currently reports 0 current US$ per person against 0 current US$ per person in Sri Lanka, a difference of 0 current US$ per person.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 52 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Sri Lanka ahead.
Equatorial Guinea ranks 95th and Sri Lanka ranks 95th of 218 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Equatorial Guinea averaged higher in 3 and Sri Lanka in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Equatorial Guinea | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 0 current US$ per person | 0 current US$ per person | 0 current US$ per person | — |
| 1980s | 0 current US$ per person | 0.0006 current US$ per person | 0.0006 current US$ per person | Sri Lanka |
| 1990s | 0.1777 current US$ per person | 0 current US$ per person | 0.1777 current US$ per person | Equatorial Guinea |
| 2000s | 0.8412 current US$ per person | 0.0216 current US$ per person | 0.8196 current US$ per person | Equatorial Guinea |
| 2010s | 0.8982 current US$ per person | 0.0443 current US$ per person | 0.8539 current US$ per person | Equatorial Guinea |
| 2020s | 0 current US$ per person | 0 current US$ per person | 0 current US$ per person | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per capita, Equatorial Guinea or Sri Lanka?
- Equatorial Guinea, at 0 current US$ per person against 0 current US$ per person in Sri Lanka as of 2021.
- What is the difference in adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per capita between Equatorial Guinea and Sri Lanka?
- 0 current US$ per person, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Sri Lanka?
- 52 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2021.
- How do Equatorial Guinea and Sri Lanka rank globally for adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per capita?
- Equatorial Guinea ranks 95th and Sri Lanka ranks 95th of 218 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.