Equatorial Guinea vs Netherlands: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per capita

Equatorial Guinea
0 current US$ per person
in 2021
Netherlands
0 current US$ per person
in 2021
Equatorial Guinea rank
95th
Netherlands rank
95th

Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per capita over time

  • Equatorial Guinea
  • Netherlands
0123197019952021

How they compare

Equatorial Guinea currently reports 0 current US$ per person against 0 current US$ per person in Netherlands, a difference of 0 current US$ per person.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 52 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Netherlands ahead.

Equatorial Guinea ranks 95th and Netherlands ranks 95th of 218 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Equatorial Guinea averaged higher in 3 and Netherlands in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Equatorial Guinea Netherlands Difference Ahead
1970s 0 current US$ per person 0.2091 current US$ per person 0.2091 current US$ per person Netherlands
1980s 0 current US$ per person 0 current US$ per person 0 current US$ per person —
1990s 0.1777 current US$ per person 0 current US$ per person 0.1777 current US$ per person Equatorial Guinea
2000s 0.8412 current US$ per person 0 current US$ per person 0.8412 current US$ per person Equatorial Guinea
2010s 0.8982 current US$ per person 0 current US$ per person 0.8982 current US$ per person Equatorial Guinea
2020s 0 current US$ per person 0 current US$ per person 0 current US$ per person —

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per capita, Equatorial Guinea or Netherlands?
Equatorial Guinea, at 0 current US$ per person against 0 current US$ per person in Netherlands as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per capita between Equatorial Guinea and Netherlands?
0 current US$ per person, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Netherlands?
52 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2021.
How do Equatorial Guinea and Netherlands rank globally for adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per capita?
Equatorial Guinea ranks 95th and Netherlands ranks 95th of 218 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Equatorial Guinea vs Netherlands: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-mineral-depletion-current-us-per-capita/equatorial-guinea/netherlands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-mineral-depletion-current-us-per-capita/equatorial-guinea/netherlands/">Equatorial Guinea vs Netherlands: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per capita
Unit
current US$ per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
219 places, 11,365 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.