Cuba vs Tanzania: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per capita

Cuba
36.35 current US$ per person
in 2021
Tanzania
33.71 current US$ per person
in 2021
Cuba rank
48th
Tanzania rank
50th

Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per capita over time

  • Cuba
  • Tanzania
0255075100197019952021

How they compare

Cuba currently reports 36.35 current US$ per person against 33.71 current US$ per person in Tanzania, a difference of 2.64 current US$ per person.

That makes Cuba's figure about 1.1 times Tanzania's.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 52 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Cuba ahead.

Cuba ranks 48th and Tanzania ranks 50th of 218 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Cuba averaged higher in 4 and Tanzania in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cuba Tanzania Difference Ahead
1970s 1.15 current US$ per person 0.0009 current US$ per person 1.15 current US$ per person Cuba
1980s 1.83 current US$ per person 0.0037 current US$ per person 1.82 current US$ per person Cuba
1990s 1.58 current US$ per person 0.0793 current US$ per person 1.5 current US$ per person Cuba
2000s 20.66 current US$ per person 2.69 current US$ per person 17.97 current US$ per person Cuba
2010s 6.62 current US$ per person 10.81 current US$ per person 4.19 current US$ per person Tanzania
2020s 21.49 current US$ per person 21.52 current US$ per person 0.0272 current US$ per person Tanzania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per capita, Cuba or Tanzania?
Cuba, at 36.35 current US$ per person against 33.71 current US$ per person in Tanzania as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per capita between Cuba and Tanzania?
2.64 current US$ per person, with Cuba ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Tanzania?
52 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2021.
How do Cuba and Tanzania rank globally for adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per capita?
Cuba ranks 48th and Tanzania ranks 50th of 218 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cuba vs Tanzania: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-mineral-depletion-current-us-per-capita/cuba/tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-mineral-depletion-current-us-per-capita/cuba/tanzania/">Cuba vs Tanzania: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per capita
Unit
current US$ per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
219 places, 11,365 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.