Congo vs United Kingdom: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per capita

Congo
0 current US$ per person
in 2021
United Kingdom
0.0208 current US$ per person
in 2021
Congo rank
95th
United Kingdom rank
93rd

Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per capita over time

  • Congo
  • United Kingdom
0123197019952021

How they compare

United Kingdom currently reports 0.0208 current US$ per person against 0 current US$ per person in Congo, a difference of 0.0208 current US$ per person.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 52 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Congo ahead.

Congo ranks 95th and United Kingdom ranks 93rd of 218 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 5 and United Kingdom in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo United Kingdom Difference Ahead
1970s 0.7515 current US$ per person 0.0485 current US$ per person 0.703 current US$ per person Congo
1980s 0.5814 current US$ per person 0.0861 current US$ per person 0.4953 current US$ per person Congo
1990s 0.767 current US$ per person 0.0046 current US$ per person 0.7623 current US$ per person Congo
2000s 0.0607 current US$ per person 0.0079 current US$ per person 0.0528 current US$ per person Congo
2010s 0.2422 current US$ per person 0.0187 current US$ per person 0.2235 current US$ per person Congo
2020s 0 current US$ per person 0.0146 current US$ per person 0.0146 current US$ per person United Kingdom

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per capita, Congo or United Kingdom?
United Kingdom, at 0.0208 current US$ per person against 0 current US$ per person in Congo as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per capita between Congo and United Kingdom?
0.0208 current US$ per person, with United Kingdom ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and United Kingdom?
52 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2021.
How do Congo and United Kingdom rank globally for adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per capita?
Congo ranks 95th and United Kingdom ranks 93rd of 218 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo vs United Kingdom: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-mineral-depletion-current-us-per-capita/congo-rep/united-kingdom/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-mineral-depletion-current-us-per-capita/congo-rep/united-kingdom/">Congo vs United Kingdom: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per capita
Unit
current US$ per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
219 places, 11,365 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.