Congo vs Suriname: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per capita
Congo
0 current US$ per person
in 2021
Suriname
0 current US$ per person
in 2021
Congo rank
95th
Suriname rank
95th
Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per capita over time
- Congo
- Suriname
How they compare
Congo currently reports 0 current US$ per person against 0 current US$ per person in Suriname, a difference of 0 current US$ per person.
Across all 52 years both countries report, Suriname has been ahead every year.
Congo ranks 95th and Suriname ranks 95th of 218 countries.
Suriname has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Suriname | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 0.7515 current US$ per person | 31.66 current US$ per person | 30.91 current US$ per person | Suriname |
| 1980s | 0.5814 current US$ per person | 32.31 current US$ per person | 31.73 current US$ per person | Suriname |
| 1990s | 0.767 current US$ per person | 18.13 current US$ per person | 17.36 current US$ per person | Suriname |
| 2000s | 0.0607 current US$ per person | 80.48 current US$ per person | 80.42 current US$ per person | Suriname |
| 2010s | 0.2422 current US$ per person | 590.26 current US$ per person | 590.01 current US$ per person | Suriname |
| 2020s | 0 current US$ per person | 0 current US$ per person | 0 current US$ per person | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per capita, Congo or Suriname?
- Congo, at 0 current US$ per person against 0 current US$ per person in Suriname as of 2021.
- What is the difference in adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per capita between Congo and Suriname?
- 0 current US$ per person, with Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Suriname?
- 52 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2021.
- How do Congo and Suriname rank globally for adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per capita?
- Congo ranks 95th and Suriname ranks 95th of 218 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.