China vs Sudan: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per capita

China
40.08 current US$ per person
in 2021
Sudan
36.72 current US$ per person
in 2021
China rank
45th
Sudan rank
46th

Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per capita over time

  • China
  • Sudan
020406080100197019952021

How they compare

China currently reports 40.08 current US$ per person against 36.72 current US$ per person in Sudan, a difference of 3.36 current US$ per person.

That makes China's figure about 1.1 times Sudan's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 52 shared years of data; in 1970 it was China ahead.

China ranks 45th and Sudan ranks 46th of 218 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, China averaged higher in 5 and Sudan in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade China Sudan Difference Ahead
1970s 0.2138 current US$ per person 0.0001 current US$ per person 0.2137 current US$ per person China
1980s 0.6696 current US$ per person 0.0048 current US$ per person 0.6648 current US$ per person China
1990s 0.9693 current US$ per person 0.1437 current US$ per person 0.8256 current US$ per person China
2000s 13.99 current US$ per person 0.6852 current US$ per person 13.31 current US$ per person China
2010s 30.07 current US$ per person 13.1 current US$ per person 16.97 current US$ per person China
2020s 25.89 current US$ per person 26.98 current US$ per person 1.1 current US$ per person Sudan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per capita, China or Sudan?
China, at 40.08 current US$ per person against 36.72 current US$ per person in Sudan as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per capita between China and Sudan?
3.36 current US$ per person, with China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China and Sudan?
52 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2021.
How do China and Sudan rank globally for adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per capita?
China ranks 45th and Sudan ranks 46th of 218 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China vs Sudan: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-mineral-depletion-current-us-per-capita/china/sudan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-mineral-depletion-current-us-per-capita/china/sudan/">China vs Sudan: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per capita
Unit
current US$ per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
219 places, 11,365 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.