Chile vs New Caledonia: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per capita

Chile
1,444 current US$ per person
in 2021
New Caledonia
3,133 current US$ per person
in 2021
Chile rank
3rd
New Caledonia rank
1st

Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per capita over time

  • Chile
  • New Caledonia
02.0k4.0k6.0k197019952021

How they compare

New Caledonia currently reports 3,133 current US$ per person against 1,444 current US$ per person in Chile, a difference of 1,689 current US$ per person.

That makes New Caledonia's figure about 2.2 times Chile's.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 52 shared years of data; in 1970 it was New Caledonia ahead.

Chile ranks 3rd and New Caledonia ranks 1st of 218 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 1 and New Caledonia in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile New Caledonia Difference Ahead
1970s 55.09 current US$ per person 246.29 current US$ per person 191.2 current US$ per person New Caledonia
1980s 79.79 current US$ per person 277.6 current US$ per person 197.81 current US$ per person New Caledonia
1990s 99.52 current US$ per person 588.42 current US$ per person 488.9 current US$ per person New Caledonia
2000s 449.91 current US$ per person 1,239 current US$ per person 788.8 current US$ per person New Caledonia
2010s 474.07 current US$ per person 95.79 current US$ per person 378.28 current US$ per person Chile
2020s 885.01 current US$ per person 1,566 current US$ per person 681.33 current US$ per person New Caledonia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per capita, Chile or New Caledonia?
New Caledonia, at 3,133 current US$ per person against 1,444 current US$ per person in Chile as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per capita between Chile and New Caledonia?
1,689 current US$ per person, with New Caledonia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and New Caledonia?
52 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2021.
How do Chile and New Caledonia rank globally for adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per capita?
Chile ranks 3rd and New Caledonia ranks 1st of 218 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs New Caledonia: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-mineral-depletion-current-us-per-capita/chile/new-caledonia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-mineral-depletion-current-us-per-capita/chile/new-caledonia/">Chile vs New Caledonia: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per capita
Unit
current US$ per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
219 places, 11,365 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.