Chile vs Guyana: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per capita

Chile
1,444 current US$ per person
in 2021
Guyana
716.98 current US$ per person
in 2021
Chile rank
3rd
Guyana rank
4th

Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per capita over time

  • Chile
  • Guyana
05001.0k1.5k197019952021

How they compare

Chile currently reports 1,444 current US$ per person against 716.98 current US$ per person in Guyana, a difference of 727.02 current US$ per person.

That makes Chile's figure about 2.0 times Guyana's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 52 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Chile ahead.

Chile ranks 3rd and Guyana ranks 4th of 218 countries.

Chile has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile Guyana Difference Ahead
1970s 55.09 current US$ per person 4.79 current US$ per person 50.3 current US$ per person Chile
1980s 79.79 current US$ per person 4.98 current US$ per person 74.81 current US$ per person Chile
1990s 99.52 current US$ per person 26.58 current US$ per person 72.94 current US$ per person Chile
2000s 449.91 current US$ per person 62.5 current US$ per person 387.4 current US$ per person Chile
2010s 474.07 current US$ per person 252.06 current US$ per person 222.01 current US$ per person Chile
2020s 885.01 current US$ per person 424.88 current US$ per person 460.12 current US$ per person Chile

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per capita, Chile or Guyana?
Chile, at 1,444 current US$ per person against 716.98 current US$ per person in Guyana as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per capita between Chile and Guyana?
727.02 current US$ per person, with Chile ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Guyana?
52 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2021.
How do Chile and Guyana rank globally for adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per capita?
Chile ranks 3rd and Guyana ranks 4th of 218 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Guyana: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-mineral-depletion-current-us-per-capita/chile/guyana/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-mineral-depletion-current-us-per-capita/chile/guyana/">Chile vs Guyana: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per capita
Unit
current US$ per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
219 places, 11,365 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.