Chad vs Equatorial Guinea: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per capita

Chad
0 current US$ per person
in 2021
Equatorial Guinea
0 current US$ per person
in 2021
Chad rank
95th
Equatorial Guinea rank
95th

Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per capita over time

  • Chad
  • Equatorial Guinea
0123197019952021

How they compare

Chad currently reports 0 current US$ per person against 0 current US$ per person in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 0 current US$ per person.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 52 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Equatorial Guinea ahead.

Chad ranks 95th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 95th of 218 countries.

Equatorial Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chad Equatorial Guinea Difference Ahead
1970s 0 current US$ per person 0 current US$ per person 0 current US$ per person —
1980s 0 current US$ per person 0 current US$ per person 0 current US$ per person —
1990s 0 current US$ per person 0.1777 current US$ per person 0.1777 current US$ per person Equatorial Guinea
2000s 0.0239 current US$ per person 0.8412 current US$ per person 0.8173 current US$ per person Equatorial Guinea
2010s 0.0228 current US$ per person 0.8982 current US$ per person 0.8754 current US$ per person Equatorial Guinea
2020s 0 current US$ per person 0 current US$ per person 0 current US$ per person —

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per capita, Chad or Equatorial Guinea?
Chad, at 0 current US$ per person against 0 current US$ per person in Equatorial Guinea as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per capita between Chad and Equatorial Guinea?
0 current US$ per person, with Chad ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chad and Equatorial Guinea?
52 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2021.
How do Chad and Equatorial Guinea rank globally for adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per capita?
Chad ranks 95th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 95th of 218 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chad vs Equatorial Guinea: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-mineral-depletion-current-us-per-capita/chad/equatorial-guinea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-mineral-depletion-current-us-per-capita/chad/equatorial-guinea/">Chad vs Equatorial Guinea: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per capita
Unit
current US$ per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
219 places, 11,365 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.