Bolivia vs South Africa: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per capita

Bolivia
153.47 current US$ per person
in 2021
South Africa
177.34 current US$ per person
in 2021
Bolivia rank
14th
South Africa rank
13th

Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per capita over time

  • Bolivia
  • South Africa
050100150200197019952021

How they compare

South Africa currently reports 177.34 current US$ per person against 153.47 current US$ per person in Bolivia, a difference of 23.87 current US$ per person.

That makes South Africa's figure about 1.2 times Bolivia's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 52 shared years of data; in 1970 it was South Africa ahead.

Bolivia ranks 14th and South Africa ranks 13th of 218 countries.

South Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bolivia South Africa Difference Ahead
1970s 5.87 current US$ per person 11.28 current US$ per person 5.41 current US$ per person South Africa
1980s 6.95 current US$ per person 62.55 current US$ per person 55.6 current US$ per person South Africa
1990s 6.92 current US$ per person 23.42 current US$ per person 16.5 current US$ per person South Africa
2000s 15.77 current US$ per person 34.42 current US$ per person 18.65 current US$ per person South Africa
2010s 42.67 current US$ per person 61.74 current US$ per person 19.06 current US$ per person South Africa
2020s 81.9 current US$ per person 116.77 current US$ per person 34.87 current US$ per person South Africa

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per capita, Bolivia or South Africa?
South Africa, at 177.34 current US$ per person against 153.47 current US$ per person in Bolivia as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per capita between Bolivia and South Africa?
23.87 current US$ per person, with South Africa ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bolivia and South Africa?
52 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2021.
How do Bolivia and South Africa rank globally for adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per capita?
Bolivia ranks 14th and South Africa ranks 13th of 218 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bolivia vs South Africa: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-mineral-depletion-current-us-per-capita/bolivia/south-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-mineral-depletion-current-us-per-capita/bolivia/south-africa/">Bolivia vs South Africa: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per capita
Unit
current US$ per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
219 places, 11,365 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.