Bolivia vs Mauritania: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per capita

Bolivia
153.47 current US$ per person
in 2021
Mauritania
137.58 current US$ per person
in 2021
Bolivia rank
14th
Mauritania rank
16th

Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per capita over time

  • Bolivia
  • Mauritania
050100150197019952021

How they compare

Bolivia currently reports 153.47 current US$ per person against 137.58 current US$ per person in Mauritania, a difference of 15.89 current US$ per person.

That makes Bolivia's figure about 1.1 times Mauritania's.

The two have swapped places 13 times across 52 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Mauritania ahead.

Bolivia ranks 14th and Mauritania ranks 16th of 218 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Bolivia averaged higher in 2 and Mauritania in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bolivia Mauritania Difference Ahead
1970s 5.87 current US$ per person 16.72 current US$ per person 10.85 current US$ per person Mauritania
1980s 6.95 current US$ per person 15.71 current US$ per person 8.76 current US$ per person Mauritania
1990s 6.92 current US$ per person 2.81 current US$ per person 4.11 current US$ per person Bolivia
2000s 15.77 current US$ per person 49.33 current US$ per person 33.56 current US$ per person Mauritania
2010s 42.67 current US$ per person 60.9 current US$ per person 18.23 current US$ per person Mauritania
2020s 81.9 current US$ per person 71.21 current US$ per person 10.69 current US$ per person Bolivia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per capita, Bolivia or Mauritania?
Bolivia, at 153.47 current US$ per person against 137.58 current US$ per person in Mauritania as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per capita between Bolivia and Mauritania?
15.89 current US$ per person, with Bolivia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bolivia and Mauritania?
52 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2021.
How do Bolivia and Mauritania rank globally for adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per capita?
Bolivia ranks 14th and Mauritania ranks 16th of 218 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bolivia vs Mauritania: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-mineral-depletion-current-us-per-capita/bolivia/mauritania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-mineral-depletion-current-us-per-capita/bolivia/mauritania/">Bolivia vs Mauritania: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per capita
Unit
current US$ per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
219 places, 11,365 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.