Bhutan vs South Sudan: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per capita
Bhutan
0.2013 current US$ per person
in 2021
South Sudan
0.6656 current US$ per person
in 2021
Bhutan rank
88th
South Sudan rank
85th
Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per capita over time
- Bhutan
- South Sudan
How they compare
South Sudan currently reports 0.6656 current US$ per person against 0.2013 current US$ per person in Bhutan, a difference of 0.4643 current US$ per person.
That makes South Sudan's figure about 3.3 times Bhutan's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 52 shared years of data; in 1970 it was South Sudan ahead.
Bhutan ranks 88th and South Sudan ranks 85th of 218 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Bhutan averaged higher in 2 and South Sudan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bhutan | South Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 0 current US$ per person | 0 current US$ per person | 0 current US$ per person | — |
| 1980s | 0 current US$ per person | 0 current US$ per person | 0 current US$ per person | — |
| 1990s | 0 current US$ per person | 0 current US$ per person | 0 current US$ per person | — |
| 2000s | 0.0093 current US$ per person | 0 current US$ per person | 0.0093 current US$ per person | Bhutan |
| 2010s | 0.2788 current US$ per person | 0.0987 current US$ per person | 0.18 current US$ per person | Bhutan |
| 2020s | 0.1801 current US$ per person | 0.4166 current US$ per person | 0.2366 current US$ per person | South Sudan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per capita, Bhutan or South Sudan?
- South Sudan, at 0.6656 current US$ per person against 0.2013 current US$ per person in Bhutan as of 2021.
- What is the difference in adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per capita between Bhutan and South Sudan?
- 0.4643 current US$ per person, with South Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bhutan and South Sudan?
- 52 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2021.
- How do Bhutan and South Sudan rank globally for adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per capita?
- Bhutan ranks 88th and South Sudan ranks 85th of 218 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.