Australia vs Guyana: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per capita

Australia
2,671 current US$ per person
in 2021
Guyana
716.98 current US$ per person
in 2021
Australia rank
2nd
Guyana rank
4th

Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per capita over time

  • Australia
  • Guyana
01.0k2.0k3.0k197019952021

How they compare

Australia currently reports 2,671 current US$ per person against 716.98 current US$ per person in Guyana, a difference of 1,954 current US$ per person.

That makes Australia's figure about 3.7 times Guyana's.

Across all 52 years both countries report, Australia has been ahead every year.

Australia ranks 2nd and Guyana ranks 4th of 218 countries.

Australia has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Guyana Difference Ahead
1970s 31.81 current US$ per person 4.79 current US$ per person 27.03 current US$ per person Australia
1980s 59.03 current US$ per person 4.98 current US$ per person 54.05 current US$ per person Australia
1990s 74.9 current US$ per person 26.58 current US$ per person 48.32 current US$ per person Australia
2000s 323.88 current US$ per person 62.5 current US$ per person 261.37 current US$ per person Australia
2010s 681.43 current US$ per person 252.06 current US$ per person 429.37 current US$ per person Australia
2020s 1,791 current US$ per person 424.88 current US$ per person 1,366 current US$ per person Australia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per capita, Australia or Guyana?
Australia, at 2,671 current US$ per person against 716.98 current US$ per person in Guyana as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per capita between Australia and Guyana?
1,954 current US$ per person, with Australia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Guyana?
52 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2021.
How do Australia and Guyana rank globally for adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per capita?
Australia ranks 2nd and Guyana ranks 4th of 218 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Guyana: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-mineral-depletion-current-us-per-capita/australia/guyana/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-mineral-depletion-current-us-per-capita/australia/guyana/">Australia vs Guyana: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per capita
Unit
current US$ per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
219 places, 11,365 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.