Australia vs Chile: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per capita

Australia
2,671 current US$ per person
in 2021
Chile
1,444 current US$ per person
in 2021
Australia rank
2nd
Chile rank
3rd

Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per capita over time

  • Australia
  • Chile
01.0k2.0k3.0k197019952021

How they compare

Australia currently reports 2,671 current US$ per person against 1,444 current US$ per person in Chile, a difference of 1,227 current US$ per person.

That makes Australia's figure about 1.9 times Chile's.

The two have swapped places 9 times across 52 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Chile ahead.

Australia ranks 2nd and Chile ranks 3rd of 218 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Australia averaged higher in 2 and Chile in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Chile Difference Ahead
1970s 31.81 current US$ per person 55.09 current US$ per person 23.28 current US$ per person Chile
1980s 59.03 current US$ per person 79.79 current US$ per person 20.76 current US$ per person Chile
1990s 74.9 current US$ per person 99.52 current US$ per person 24.62 current US$ per person Chile
2000s 323.88 current US$ per person 449.91 current US$ per person 126.03 current US$ per person Chile
2010s 681.43 current US$ per person 474.07 current US$ per person 207.37 current US$ per person Australia
2020s 1,791 current US$ per person 885.01 current US$ per person 906.29 current US$ per person Australia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per capita, Australia or Chile?
Australia, at 2,671 current US$ per person against 1,444 current US$ per person in Chile as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per capita between Australia and Chile?
1,227 current US$ per person, with Australia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Chile?
52 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2021.
How do Australia and Chile rank globally for adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per capita?
Australia ranks 2nd and Chile ranks 3rd of 218 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Chile: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-mineral-depletion-current-us-per-capita/australia/chile/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-mineral-depletion-current-us-per-capita/australia/chile/">Australia vs Chile: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per capita
Unit
current US$ per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
219 places, 11,365 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.